Skip to content

Hazel/mcp#2398

Draft
Hazel-Datastax wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
hazel/mcp
Draft

Hazel/mcp#2398
Hazel-Datastax wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
hazel/mcp

Conversation

@Hazel-Datastax
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • Changes manually tested
  • Automated Tests added/updated
  • Documentation added/updated
  • CLA Signed: DataStax CLA

@Hazel-Datastax Hazel-Datastax requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2026 01:02
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

📉 Unit Test Coverage Delta vs Main Branch

Metric Value
Main Branch 50.29%
This PR 49.61%
Delta 🔴 -0.68%
⚠️ Coverage decreased

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Unit Test Coverage Report

Overall Project 49.61% -1.36% 🍏
Files changed 0%

File Coverage
RequestContext.java 16% -31.2%
McpToolsHelper.java 0%
KeyspaceCommandTools.java 0%
CollectionCommandTools.java 0%
GeneralCommandTools.java 0%

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

📉 Integration Test Coverage Delta vs Main Branch (dse69-it)

Metric Value
Main Branch 70.74%
This PR 69.77%
Delta 🔴 -0.96%
⚠️ Coverage decreased

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Integration Test Coverage Report (dse69-it)

Overall Project 69.77% -1.36% 🍏
Files changed 0%

File Coverage
RequestContext.java 47.83% -30.83%
McpToolsHelper.java 0% -99.08%
KeyspaceCommandTools.java 0%
CollectionCommandTools.java 0%
GeneralCommandTools.java 0%

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

📉 Integration Test Coverage Delta vs Main Branch (hcd-it)

Metric Value
Main Branch 72.49%
This PR 71.50%
Delta 🔴 -0.99%
⚠️ Coverage decreased

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Integration Test Coverage Report (hcd-it)

Overall Project 71.5% -1.36% 🍏
Files changed 0%

File Coverage
RequestContext.java 47.83% -30.83%
McpToolsHelper.java 0% -99.08%
KeyspaceCommandTools.java 0%
CollectionCommandTools.java 0%
GeneralCommandTools.java 0%

* projection.
*/
public JsonNode emptyObjectNode() {
return JsonNodeFactory.instance.objectNode();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: better to use objectMapper.createObjectNode()

Copy link
Contributor

@tatu-at-datastax tatu-at-datastax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far! Needs tests, probably the next thing to focus on?

@Hazel-Datastax Hazel-Datastax marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2026 06:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments