Conversation
prabau
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
prabau
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
Co-authored-by: Patrick Rabau <70125716+prabau@users.noreply.github.com>
prabau
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
Co-authored-by: Patrick Rabau <70125716+prabau@users.noreply.github.com>
prabau
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
|
|
||
| Assume there are $a,b\in X$ with $a<b$ such that there is a path from $a$ to $b$. By the intermediate value theorem, $(a,b)\subseteq X$. | ||
| Take a copy $B$ of the Cantor set contained with the interval $(a,b)$. | ||
| Take a copy $B$ of the Cantor set contained within the interval $(a,b)$. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess this is ok. One could also say "contained in the interval ...".
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it suggested me "in" but i prefered "within"...
prabau
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Once again, I checked all the typos manually (and in fact changed the text manually).
I let it go over all files 3 times, the third time it basically found nothing anymore, so while there are likely still more typos, the vast majority should be gone. This is likely my final typo PR of this form.
In some old files
\(...\)is used instead of$...$. Its probably better we replace this (i did in like 3 files), but I wasnt motivated to do all of them. Not super important anyways.