Skip to content

Conversation

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

@TheLarkInn TheLarkInn commented Feb 9, 2026

  • Add https://github.com/flora131/atomic Claude Code plugin as a local plugin under claude-plugins/atomic-workflow-plugin/
  • Replace generic template CLAUDE.md with Rush Stack-specific project instructions (monorepo structure, build commands, code conventions, verification steps, progressive disclosure)
  • Add .mcp.json with DeepWiki MCP server configuration
  • Simplify .claude/settings.json: remove telemetry hook, remove remote marketplace reference, point to local plugin directory instead
  • Remove .claude/hooks/telemetry-stop.ts (telemetry tracking hook no longer needed)
  • Move all Atomic agents, commands, and skills from .claude/ into the plugin directory structure (claude-plugins/atomic-workflow-plugin/)
  • Add specs/ and research/ to .gitignore for Atomic workflow artifacts
  • Include example research docs generated by the Atomic workflow (research/docs/)
  • This should also be supported by copilot cli as well

The directory is already in .gitignore but was tracked before the rule was added.
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
MIT License

Copyright (c) 2025 Flora
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like this should be installed from a service, like NPM packages, rather than copy+pasted into each repo.

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
{
Copy link
Collaborator

@octogonz octogonz Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a way to configure these agentic features in a vendor-netural way?

For example, @L-Qun and I recently were proposing to deprecate Rush's vendor-specific context files and replace it with AGENTS.md + skills in a vendor-netural folder.

The concern is that:

  1. There more and more agents every day, it's unrealistic to support them all.
  2. The "formats" are all just markdown files that any LLM can understand easily. Besides vendor lock-in, there doesn't seem to be compelling technical justification for vendor-specific plugins.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Needs triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants