Merged
Conversation
natoverse
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
natoverse
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix for #2242
This pull request addresses a bug in the CSV file reader by improving how multiline fields are handled. The main change ensures that quoted CSV fields containing internal newlines are correctly preserved, and a new test verifies this behavior.
CSV reader bug fix:
CSVFileReader.read_fileto useio.StringIO, ensuring proper handling of multiline quoted fields.Testing improvements:
test_csv_loader_preserves_multiline_fieldsintest_csv_loader.pyto verify that multiline quoted CSV fields retain their internal newlines.Miscellaneous:
ioimport incsv.pyto support the new CSV reading logic.