Skip to content

Comments

refactor(@angular/build): Expose codeBundleCache to buildApplicationInternal#32527

Open
Aukevanoost wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Aukevanoost:feat/expose-cache
Open

refactor(@angular/build): Expose codeBundleCache to buildApplicationInternal#32527
Aukevanoost wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Aukevanoost:feat/expose-cache

Conversation

@Aukevanoost
Copy link
Contributor

@Aukevanoost Aukevanoost commented Feb 20, 2026

First off, thanks for having a look at this!

This PR exposes the codeBundleCache used in executeBuild part of the buildApplicationInternal to allow for performant multi-builder setups (because they can share the TS cache).

PR Checklist

Please check to confirm your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Right now the SourceFileCache is initialized locally in the executeBuild() function.

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

The SourceFileCache is now part of the InternalOptions, allowing tools that use this builder to (optionally) provide a shared cache that can be re-used over multiple builds. As fallback it will create the default cache object.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

We (native-federation) need this feature to speed up our builder. This way we can share the cache between the ESBuild plugin and main builder which decreases our build time drastically:

If interested, find the changes on our end here (it's a proof-of-concept): https://github.com/native-federation/angular-adapter/pull/4/changes#diff-6508a5b483eb2d55fd58361931d864832b5ba20178c796d07be21f9e8ac327ae

Exposes the codeBundle cache used in executeBuild to allow for
performant multi-builder setups.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant