You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firstly thanks for the work on python-can - it's a great module!
I was just wondering what the intended / ideal scope is for the viewer.py tool is? The motivation for me asking is that over the past few years I've developed a personal fork that was based on an earlier version of it where I've added quite a few features which make it a much more useful and powerful tool :
Detailed breakdown of signal values within a message
Implemented in the main pane using a curses "tree view" style
Takes message / signal name, field and value definitions from a cantools database (supports dbc, sym etc)
Optional (curses) sidebar to display detailed info :
Interface / bus details
CAN ID breakdown (protocol dependent)
CAN data breakdown (hex / bin decode inc highlighting decoded signals)
Frame statistics
Other internal application specific info
I'm sure these would be of use to others, but I'm not sure if the appropriate way to share is to integrate into python-can or if I should offer to the cantools project, or just make a separate standalone repo for it.
I feel like python-can is the first port of call given that I've forked from your existing code here, but I'd like to find out if it would be welcomed or not before I put the effort in!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
Firstly thanks for the work on python-can - it's a great module!
I was just wondering what the intended / ideal scope is for the viewer.py tool is? The motivation for me asking is that over the past few years I've developed a personal fork that was based on an earlier version of it where I've added quite a few features which make it a much more useful and powerful tool :
I'm sure these would be of use to others, but I'm not sure if the appropriate way to share is to integrate into python-can or if I should offer to the cantools project, or just make a separate standalone repo for it.
I feel like python-can is the first port of call given that I've forked from your existing code here, but I'd like to find out if it would be welcomed or not before I put the effort in!
~Pev
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions