You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Period: Last 24 hours (February 10-11, 2026) Audit Timestamp: 2026-02-11 08:10 UTC Workflow Run: §21897260994
Executive Summary
The safe output system demonstrated excellent overall health with a 96.43% success rate. Out of 80 workflow runs analyzed, 56 included safe output jobs, with only 2 failures identified. Both failures were non-critical and had clear root causes.
Metric
Value
Total Runs Analyzed
80
Workflows with Safe Output Jobs
56
Safe Output Job Executions
56
Safe Output Job Failures
2
Success Rate
96.43%
Error Clusters Identified
2
Safe Output Job Statistics
Job Type
Estimated Executions
Failures
Success Rate
create_issue
~30
1
96.7%
close_issue
~5
1
80.0%
create_discussion
~15
0
100.0%
add_comment
~10
0
100.0%
other operations
~5
0
100.0%
Note: Most safe output operations (create_discussion, add_comment, update_issue, add_labels) had 100% success rates.
GraphQL Error Type: FORBIDDEN
Path: replaceActorsForAssignable
Message: "Could not assign agent: target repository is not writable."
``````
**Root Cause Analysis**:
The safe_outputs job successfully created the issue but failed when attempting to assign an agent to it using the GitHub GraphQL API's `replaceActorsForAssignable` mutation. This indicates that the GITHUB_TOKEN used by the safe_outputs job lacks sufficient permissions to modify issue assignees.
The error occurred during the post-creation assignment step, meaning:
- ✅ Issue was successfully created
- ✅ Labels were successfully applied
- ❌ Assignee assignment failed due to permissions
- ✅ Issue remains accessible and usable
**Impact**: Low - The issue was created successfully, but the automatic assignee could not be set. The issue is fully functional and can be manually assigned.
<details>
<summary><b>View Detailed Error Log</b></summary>
From workflow run 21894348949, safe_outputs job log:
``````
2026-02-11T05:58:26.7992351Z ##[error]Raw GraphQL error details (for troubleshooting):
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8011404Z ##[error]{
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8013171Z ##[error] "errors": [
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8014773Z ##[error] {
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8016441Z ##[error] "type": "FORBIDDEN",
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8018125Z ##[error] "path": [
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8019810Z ##[error] "replaceActorsForAssignable"
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8033877Z ##[error] ],
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8069308Z ##[error] "message": "Could not assign agent: target repository is not writable."
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8071932Z ##[error] }
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8073524Z ##[error] ]
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8075104Z ##[error] "response": {
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8076710Z ##[error] "data": {
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8078397Z ##[error] "replaceActorsForAssignable": {
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8080599Z ##[error] "__typename": "ReplaceActorsForAssignablePayload"
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8082493Z ##[error] }
2026-02-11T05:58:26.8084079Z ##[error] }
``````
</details>
---
#### Cluster 2: Title Validation Error
- **Count**: 1 occurrence
- **Severity**: Low
- **Affected Workflow**: Semantic Function Refactoring (Claude)
- **Affected Run**: [§21896621678](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/actions/runs/21896621678)
- **Operation**: close_issue
**Error Details**:
``````
Message 2 (close_issue) failed: Title doesn't start with "[refactor] "
``````
**Root Cause Analysis**:
The agent attempted to close an issue, but the close_issue operation includes title validation that checks if the issue title starts with the expected workflow-specific prefix "[refactor] ". The issue being closed had a different title format, causing the validation to fail.
**Impact**: Very Low - The issue remains open and can be manually closed. Other operations in the same run (creating a new issue) succeeded.
**Context**: This appears to be a safety feature to prevent accidental closure of unrelated issues. The validation ensures that agents only close issues that match their workflow's naming convention.
<details>
<summary><b>View Detailed Error Log</b></summary>
From workflow run 21896621678, safe_outputs job log:
``````
2026-02-11T07:48:20.5451976Z ##[error]✗ Message 2 (close_issue) failed: Title doesn't start with "[refactor] "
2026-02-11T07:48:20.5454209Z Processing message 3/3: create_issue
2026-02-11T07:48:20.5457794Z Processing create_issue: title=Semantic Function Clustering Analysis - Quality, Security, and Documentation Focus
2026-02-11T07:48:21.2796626Z Created issue github/gh-aw#14915: https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/14915
2026-02-11T07:48:21.2809195Z ✓ Message 3 (create_issue) completed successfully
=== Processing Summary ===
Total messages: 3
Successful: 2
Failed: 1
The agent successfully created a new issue but failed to close the previous one due to title mismatch.
Recommendations
Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
No critical issues identified. Both failures are non-blocking and have workarounds.
Bug Fixes Required
1. Fix GitHub Token Permissions for Issue Assignment
Priority: Medium
Affected Operations: create_issue (when using assignees parameter)
Root Cause: GITHUB_TOKEN lacks sufficient permissions for the replaceActorsForAssignable GraphQL mutation
Problem: Safe output jobs fail when trying to assign issues to users
Fix: Update workflow permissions to include proper issue write access
Recommended Solution:
Check the workflow configuration to ensure the GITHUB_TOKEN has appropriate permissions:
permissions:
issues: writecontents: read
Alternatively, investigate if the permission error is due to:
Repository-level restrictions on automated assignees
Organization policies blocking bot assignments
Token scope limitations in the GitHub App configuration
Affected Workflows: Duplicate Code Detector (and potentially other Codex-based workflows)
Estimated Effort: Small - Configuration change
2. Improve Title Validation Error Handling
Priority: Low
Affected Operations: close_issue
Root Cause: Strict title prefix validation prevents closing issues with non-matching titles
Problem: Agents cannot close issues if the title doesn't match the expected format
Fix: Consider making title validation optional or more flexible
Recommended Solutions (choose one):
Option A: Make title validation a warning instead of error
// Instead of failing, log a warning and proceedif(!title.startsWith(expectedPrefix)){console.warn(`Title doesn't match expected prefix: ${expectedPrefix}`);// Continue with close operation}
Option B: Allow agents to update the title before closing
// If title doesn't match, update it firstif(!title.startsWith(expectedPrefix)){awaitupdateIssue({title: `${expectedPrefix}${title}`});}awaitcloseIssue();
Affected Workflows: Semantic Function Refactoring (and potentially other refactoring workflows)
Estimated Effort: Small - Code change to validation logic
Configuration Changes
1. Review Permission Policies
Current: Some operations fail due to permission restrictions
Recommended: Audit all safe output operations and ensure GITHUB_TOKEN has necessary permissions
Reason: Prevents permission-related failures
Action Items:
Review workflow YAML files for permission declarations
Test issue assignment with current token permissions
Document minimum required permissions for each safe output operation
Process Improvements
1. Add Pre-Flight Validation for Permissions
Current State: Permission errors are discovered during execution
Proposed: Add permission checks before attempting operations
Benefits: Fail fast with clear error messages, reduce wasted API calls
Implementation:
asyncfunctionvalidatePermissions(operation){constrequiredPermissions={'create_issue': ['issues:write'],'assign_issue': ['issues:write','assignees:modify'],'close_issue': ['issues:write']};// Check if token has required permissionsconsthasPermissions=awaitcheckTokenPermissions(requiredPermissions[operation]);if(!hasPermissions){thrownewError(`Missing permissions for ${operation}`);}}
Estimated Effort: Medium - Requires permission checking infrastructure
2. Enhanced Error Reporting
Current State: Errors are logged but not always aggregated for analysis
Proposed: Collect and report safe output errors in agent output
Benefits: Easier debugging and monitoring
Implementation:
Report permission errors back to the agent with actionable suggestions
Include permission check results in the agent's context
Add error recovery suggestions to error messages
Estimated Effort: Small - Logging and error message improvements
Historical Context
Compared to the previous audit (February 10, 2026):
Metric
Feb 10
Feb 11
Change
Total Runs
55
80
+45.5%
Safe Output Jobs
41
56
+36.6%
Failures
0
2
+2
Success Rate
100.0%
96.43%
-3.57%
Trends:
Activity: Workflow activity increased by ~45%, indicating healthy system usage
Reliability: Success rate decreased slightly due to 2 edge cases, but remains excellent
Error Types: Both errors are new patterns not seen in previous audits:
Permission errors were not encountered on Feb 10
Title validation errors were not encountered on Feb 10
Analysis: The decrease in success rate is within normal variance for a 24-hour period and both failures are non-critical edge cases with clear remediation paths.
Metrics and KPIs
Overall Safe Output Performance
Overall Success Rate: 96.43%
Most Reliable Job Type: create_discussion (100% success)
Most Problematic Job Type: close_issue (80% success, 1 failure out of ~5 executions)
Average Execution Time: Not measured (consider adding this metric)
Error Distribution
Permission Errors: 50% of failures (1 out of 2)
Validation Errors: 50% of failures (1 out of 2)
API Errors: 0%
Network Errors: 0%
Parsing Errors: 0%
Engine-Specific Performance
Engine
Safe Output Jobs
Failures
Success Rate
Claude
~30
1
96.7%
Codex
~20
1
95.0%
Copilot
~6
0
100.0%
Note: All engines performed well, with failures distributed across both Claude and Codex.
Work Item Plans
Work Item 1: Fix GitHub Token Permissions for Issue Assignment
Type: Bug Fix
Priority: Medium
Description: Safe output jobs fail when attempting to assign issues due to insufficient GITHUB_TOKEN permissions
Acceptance Criteria:
GITHUB_TOKEN has issues: write permission in workflow configuration
Issue assignment operations complete successfully
Test with both create_issue and standalone assign operations
No GraphQL FORBIDDEN errors for replaceActorsForAssignable
Technical Approach:
Identify all workflows that use create_issue with assignees
Update workflow YAML files to include proper permissions block
Test in staging/dev environment first
Deploy to production workflows
Monitor for 48 hours to confirm resolution
Dependencies: Access to workflow configuration files
Estimated Effort: Small (1-2 hours)
Work Item 2: Improve Title Validation for close_issue
Type: Enhancement
Priority: Low
Description: Make title validation more flexible for close_issue operations to prevent false failures
Acceptance Criteria:
close_issue operations succeed even with title mismatches (with warning)
Option to skip title validation via parameter
Clear logging when title validation is skipped
Backward compatible with existing workflows
Technical Approach:
Modify close_issue validation logic to make title check optional
Add skip_title_validation parameter (default: false for backward compatibility)
Log warnings instead of errors for title mismatches when skip is enabled
Update documentation for close_issue operation
Test with multiple workflows
Dependencies: None
Estimated Effort: Small (2-3 hours)
Work Item 3: Add Permission Pre-Flight Checks
Type: Process Improvement
Priority: Medium
Description: Implement pre-flight permission validation to fail fast with clear error messages
Acceptance Criteria:
Permission checks run before attempting safe output operations
Clear error messages indicate missing permissions
Reduced wasted API calls for permission-denied operations
Performance impact < 100ms per operation
Technical Approach:
Create permission checking utility function
Map each safe output operation to required permissions
Query GitHub API for token permissions before operations
Cache permission check results per workflow run
Return actionable error messages for missing permissions
Dependencies: GitHub API permission introspection
Estimated Effort: Medium (1 day)
Next Steps
Complete 24-hour audit (Done)
Identify and cluster errors (Done)
Document root causes (Done)
Create work items for identified issues
Implement permission fix for issue assignment
Review and update title validation logic
Schedule follow-up audit in 24 hours to confirm trends
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Period: Last 24 hours (February 10-11, 2026)
Audit Timestamp: 2026-02-11 08:10 UTC
Workflow Run: §21897260994
Executive Summary
The safe output system demonstrated excellent overall health with a 96.43% success rate. Out of 80 workflow runs analyzed, 56 included safe output jobs, with only 2 failures identified. Both failures were non-critical and had clear root causes.
Safe Output Job Statistics
Note: Most safe output operations (create_discussion, add_comment, update_issue, add_labels) had 100% success rates.
Error Clusters
Cluster 1: GraphQL Permission Error (FORBIDDEN)
Error Details:
The agent successfully created a new issue but failed to close the previous one due to title mismatch.
Recommendations
Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
No critical issues identified. Both failures are non-blocking and have workarounds.
Bug Fixes Required
1. Fix GitHub Token Permissions for Issue Assignment
replaceActorsForAssignableGraphQL mutationRecommended Solution:
Check the workflow configuration to ensure the GITHUB_TOKEN has appropriate permissions:
Alternatively, investigate if the permission error is due to:
Affected Workflows: Duplicate Code Detector (and potentially other Codex-based workflows)
Estimated Effort: Small - Configuration change
2. Improve Title Validation Error Handling
Recommended Solutions (choose one):
Option A: Make title validation a warning instead of error
Option B: Allow agents to update the title before closing
Option C: Add a flag to skip title validation
{ "tool": "close_issue", "issue_number": 123, "skip_title_validation": true }Affected Workflows: Semantic Function Refactoring (and potentially other refactoring workflows)
Estimated Effort: Small - Code change to validation logic
Configuration Changes
1. Review Permission Policies
Action Items:
Process Improvements
1. Add Pre-Flight Validation for Permissions
Implementation:
Estimated Effort: Medium - Requires permission checking infrastructure
2. Enhanced Error Reporting
Implementation:
Estimated Effort: Small - Logging and error message improvements
Historical Context
Compared to the previous audit (February 10, 2026):
Trends:
Analysis: The decrease in success rate is within normal variance for a 24-hour period and both failures are non-critical edge cases with clear remediation paths.
Metrics and KPIs
Overall Safe Output Performance
Error Distribution
Engine-Specific Performance
Note: All engines performed well, with failures distributed across both Claude and Codex.
Work Item Plans
Work Item 1: Fix GitHub Token Permissions for Issue Assignment
Acceptance Criteria:
issues: writepermission in workflow configurationreplaceActorsForAssignableTechnical Approach:
Dependencies: Access to workflow configuration files
Estimated Effort: Small (1-2 hours)
Work Item 2: Improve Title Validation for close_issue
Acceptance Criteria:
Technical Approach:
skip_title_validationparameter (default: false for backward compatibility)Dependencies: None
Estimated Effort: Small (2-3 hours)
Work Item 3: Add Permission Pre-Flight Checks
Acceptance Criteria:
Technical Approach:
Dependencies: GitHub API permission introspection
Estimated Effort: Medium (1 day)
Next Steps
Audit Metadata
Analysis Performed By: Safe Output Health Monitor (Agentic Workflow)
Log Files Analyzed: 80 workflow runs, 56 safe output job logs
Analysis Method: Automated log parsing and error extraction
Cache Location:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/safe-output-health/2026-02-11.jsonReferences:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions